Al Gore clearly understands the Web 2.0 phenomenon. He did, after all, help create
CurrentTV.
So why doesn't he engage in the conversation with us, the
Draft Gore movement? His silence is not only infuriating to people who have decided the ballot filing deadline of Nov. 2 (that'd be today) would be the
end of their hope that Gore will run. The author of that blog post is, by the way, one of the leaders of the movement.
There are some diehards like me who won't lose hope until the Dems nominate another candidate in
Denver. I'm not a political animal that will jump to hit the streets of another candidate. I like Edwards, but I probably wouldn't actively campaign for him.
The only person who has ever gotten me interested in politics, in getting the word out, in going to meetings, in actively campaigning for him/her has been Al Gore.
I think it's nearing time for him to engage in the conversation with his loyal followers. He had such a strong backing and such a load of followers who could have turned into staffers and campaigners a few weeks ago.
Is this part of his plan? To weed out the people who aren't diehards? A great many people think he's waiting for Hillary to falter. Personally, I think the polls don't really reflect accurately the popularity of Hillary, but maybe he's waiting for the polls to reflect a downward trend.
I just wish he'd start talking to us about this. If he really believes in the new communication methods, why would he want us to talk to him if he doesn't talk back? He has not said yet that he's definitely not running and thanks for the support, but time to give up, as he apparently did to the Draft Gore movement in 2003.
Talk to us, Al. You're
begging us to talk to you. Don't be too good to take your own advice. Please. We need you to step up.
Labels: Al_Gore, Current_TV, draft_Gore